|
|
|
@ -57,9 +57,11 @@ object with a couple of methods.
|
|
|
|
What's with the name?
|
|
|
|
What's with the name?
|
|
|
|
---------------------
|
|
|
|
---------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Well, "Flot" is like "Plot".
|
|
|
|
First: it's pronounced with a short o, like "plot". Not like "flawed".
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
So "Flot" is like "Plot".
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
And if you look up "flot" in a Danish-to-English dictionary, some up
|
|
|
|
And if you look up "flot" in a Danish-to-English dictionary, some up
|
|
|
|
the words that come up are "good-looking", "attractive", "stylish",
|
|
|
|
the words that come up are "good-looking", "attractive", "stylish",
|
|
|
|
"smart", "impressive", "extravagant". One of the main goals with Flot
|
|
|
|
"smart", "impressive", "extravagant". One of the main goals with Flot
|
|
|
|
is pretty looks.
|
|
|
|
is pretty looks. Flot is supposed to be "flot".
|
|
|
|
|